The Planning and Zoning
Committee of the DeKalb County Board met on June 22, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Conference Room East located in the DeKalb County Administration
Building. In attendance were Committee Members Patricia Vary, Marlene
Allen, Eileen Dubin, Howard Lyle and Vince Faivre, and staff members Paul
Miller and Cky Ready. Audience members included: Marie and Norbert
Leffelman, Greg and Elizabeth Gavin, and Richard Schmack.
Ms.
Vary, Committee Vice-Chairman, called the meeting to order. She noted that
Committee members Roger Steimel and Steve Slack were absent.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mrs. Dubin moved to
approve the minutes of the May 25, 2005 meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Committee, seconded by Mr. Lyle, and the motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mr. Faivre moved to
approve the agenda, seconded by Mrs. Allen, and the motion carried
unanimously.
STORMWATER REGULATIONS
AMENDMENTS -- Proposal to amend provisions of the County stormwater
management regulations to integrate elements of the Model Stormwater
Management Ordinance
Mr.
Miller stated that at its May 25, 2005 meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Committee considered the proposal to update the County’s stormwater
management regulations to bring them in line with a Model Stormwater
Management Ordinance. The model ordinance was prepared at the request of
DeKalb County and the cities of DeKalb, Sycamore and Sandwich. The intent
was to establish a uniform set of regulations and design criteria
applicable to new developments so that the treatment of stormwater runoff
would be consistent in each of the autonomous jurisdictions. The
Committee had directed staff to prepare a draft of an amended set of
regulations that integrate the applicable portions of the model ordinance,
along with identification of what provisions of the County Code would need
to be amended to accommodate the changes. Mr. Miller explained that the
draft regulations were in the Committee’s information. He also stated
that staff had investigated the possible influence of a piece of pending
legislation in the State capital that has potential bearing on the ability
of counties to regulate stormwater management. Staff consulted with the
State’s Attorney’s office and concluded that the legislation would likely
only legitimize what the County already does.
Mr.
Faivre stated that it was his understanding that farmland and farm
buildings would be exempt from stormwater management regulations. Mr.
Miller indicated that is correct; the current regulations exempt typical
farming activities, with the only exceptions being for the construction of
buildings or mass excavation within 100 feet of a floodplain. In that case
they would not nor are they now exempt. Mr. Faivre also indicated that
if a committee were to be assembled to draft a county-wide stormwater
ordinance, in accordance with the provisions of the pending legislation,
that committee’s authority would not supercede any authority currently
held by the drainage districts. Mr. Miller indicated that DeKalb County
Planning, Zoning & Building Department has never had any conflicts with
area Drainage Districts over current stormwater management permits, nor
does Mr. Miller anticipate that there would be any created by the current
proposed stormwater regulations.
Mrs.
Dubin asked if anything in the proposed stormwater regulations give the
Planning Director or the Planning and Zoning Committee any more authority
than they currently have. Mr. Miller indicated that the proposed changes
do not give any more authority to the Planning Director or the Planning
and Zoning Committee.
Mr.
Faivre asked if the cost to fund this program laid out by the pending
legislation in Springfield would go through referendum. Mr. Miller
indicated that the only thing that would have to go through referendum was
if the County Board wanted to finance the actual construction of
stormwater management facilities such as dams, channel realignment
projects, or major stormwater retention or detention facilities, etc..
Mr. Miller stated that unless the County decided to implement a project
there would be no need for a referendum to tax.
Mr.
Faivre asked what would be the cost to implement the proposed stormwater
regulations. Mr. Miller indicated that there would be no additional costs
to adopt the amended stormwater regulations.
Mr. Faivre moved to
approve the amended Site Development Permit regulations, Chapter 30,
Article 1 of the DeKalb County Code, seconded by Mrs. Allen, and the
motion carried unanimously.
L.E.S.A. AMENDMENT
-- Proposal to amend the Land Evaluation portion of the L.E.S.A.
program
Mr.
Miller stated that at its May 25, 2005 meeting, the Planning and Zoning
Committee discussed a possible update to the County’s Land Evaluation Site
Assessment (L.E.S.A.) System. This system is used by the Soil and Water
Conservation District and the Planning, Zoning and Building Department
every time there is a development proposal to evaluate whether the subject
property should instead be preserved for agricultural use. The proposed
update relates to the Land Evaluation element of the system, which rates
the various soils throughout the County and evaluates the specific soils
on a given property in terms of viability for agriculture. New soils
classifications have now been forwarded by the DeKalb County Soil and
Water Conservation District and recommended for approval. The Committee
is requested to forward a recommendation to the full County Board to adopt
the update. If the County Board approves the revision by ordinance, a
copy would then be forwarded to the State Conservationist for approval.
A
discussion took place about the definition and clarification of terms used
in the L.E.S.A. documentation.
Mr.
Faivre indicated that he was not so much concerned with the L.E. (land
evaluation) portion of the L.E.S.A. as he was about the S.A. (site
assessment) portion of it. Mr. Miller stated that the S.A. part of
L.E.S.A. had been updated in 2000, and proceeded to point out several of
the changes that were made at that time. Mr. Miller also pointed out the
L.E.S.A. system is subject to State review and approval. The S.A. portion
that was changed in 2000 had to go to the State Conservation Service and
be reviewed and approved. No changes to the S.A. portion are proposed at
this time. Mr. Miller also noted that the L.E.S.A. evaluation, while
important, is only one tool used in the evaluation process. Whenever a
land use decision is looked at, factors such as the recommendation of the
Comprehensive Plan, the policy and precedent that would be set by a land
use decision, if approved, as well as the L.E.S.A. assessment, are taken
into consideration.
Mrs. Dubin moved to
approve the update to the Land Evaluation portion of the County L.E.S.A.
system, seconded by Mr Lyle, and the motion carried unanimously.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
-- Request of Gregory and Elizabeth Gavin for approval of an auction
business in and around buildings formerly used for agriculture on property
located on the south side of Chicago Road in Sandwich Township, Petition
SA-05-07.
Gregory and Elizabeth Gavin have filed a petition for approval of a
Special Use Permit to allow the operation of an auction business on
property located at 16746 Chicago Road in Sandwich Township. The auctions
would take place around existing agricultural buildings that are no longer
used for agriculture, and associated parking would take place on the
subject property and on a portion of the adjacent farm. The property is
located approximately 0.7 miles west of East Sandwich Road, and is zoned
A-1, Agricultural District.
Mr. Miller explained that the required public hearing was conducted on May
19, 2005 by DeKalb County Hearing Officer Ron Klein. The petitioners
provided testimony and exhibits in support of the requested Special Use,
including that the petitioners have conducted auctions on the property for
the past several years, and no complaints about the operation have been
received except when parking has occurred on the Chicago Road right-of-way.
The petitioners also indicated they would like to be able to conduct up to
16 auctions per year, and provided evidence that the owner of the adjoining
property has given them approval to use seven acres for parking purposes.
One member of the public spoke in favor of the request and none in
opposition, and a letter from the City of Sandwich was received indicating
support for the petition. The County Engineer and Planning Director
highlighted the importance of restricting parking associated with the
auctions to private property, and not on the public right-of-way. The
Hearing Officer has submitted his findings, and recommends approval of the
Special Use Permit with conditions, including:
1. That
the goods sold at the auctions be owned by the Petitioner;
2. That the hours of
the auction be from 6:30 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. on either a Saturday or Sunday,
and that there be no more than sixteen (16) auctions per year;
3. That
there be no permanent signs for the auction; and
4. That the only food sold
on the premises be from a portable food stand, and that there be no
permanent food serving facilities on the property.
Mr.
Miller added that the petitioner has asked that the Committee consider
allowing a permanent sign for the auction business, and that the petitioners
be allowed to pass the auction business to their sons without having to
revisit the Special Use process. Mr. Miller indicated that both of these
requests are minor amendments to the conditions recommended by the Hearing
Officer.
Mr. Lyle
indicated that he did not see a problem with granting the auction business a
sign.
Mrs.
Allen pointed out that if Mr. Gavin passed the business on to his children,
no Special Use proceeding would be necessary, but in the event his children
sell the business the new owners the new owners would be required to reapply
for a Special Use Permit.
Mr.
Faivre asked if any type of traffic control by the Sheriff’s Department had
ever been required. Mr. Gavin indicated that they had never required
traffic control by the Sheriffs Department.
Ms. Vary
inquired about the size of the parking area. Mr. Miller indicated that the
total property to be used by the Gavin’s was seven acres.
Mrs. Allen moved to
approve the Special Use, including allowing a sign and the ability to pass
the business along to the children, seconded by Mr. Lyle, and the motion
carried unanimously.
USE VARIATION --
Request of Norbert and Marie Leffleman for approval of a house on 0.75
acres located on the north side of Harter Road in Pierce Township, Petition
PI-05-09
Norbert
and Marie Leffelman, the property owners, have filed a petition for a Use
Variance for a vacant 0.75-acre parcel located on the north side of Harter
Road, approximately 565 feet west of East County Line Road, in Pierce
Township. The petition is to allow the construction of one single-family
detached dwelling on an agriculturally-zoned parcel of less than 40 acres in
size. The subject property is zoned A-1, Agricultural District.
Mr.
Miller explained that the public hearing on the requested Use Variance was
held by DeKalb County Hearing Officer Ron Klein on June 9, 2005. The
petitioner’s presented evidence that the property pre-dated 1976 and that
the subject property was one of several 3/4-acre lots on the north side of
Harter Road, most of which have been developed with houses. No members of
the public spoke in favor of or in opposition to the request. The Hearing
Officer has submitted his Findings and Recommendation and recommends
approval of the request.
Mr.
Faivre stated that this was an issue that had been addressed many times and
when the petitioners meet all the criteria set forth in the County Zoning
Ordinance it is only fair to approve the Variation.
Ms. Vary
stated that the petitioners met all the requirements except for the hardship
requirement.
Mrs.
Dubin inquired as to the location of the septic system. Mr. Miller stated
that the septic system would be subject to approval by the County Health
Department.
Mr. Faivre moved to
approve the Variation, seconded by Mrs. Dubin, and the motion carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT -
Motion to adjourn by Mr. Lyle, seconded by Mrs. Allen, and the motion
carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
Pat Vary, Vice-Chairman
Planning and Regulations Committee Chairman
CR:cr
|