|
The Finance Committee of the DeKalb County
Board, met on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 @ 7:00p.m. in the Administration
Building’s Conference Room East. Chairman Michael Haines called the meeting
to order. Members present were Jerry Augsburger, Vince Faivre, Julia
Fullerton, John Hulseberg, Roger Steimel and Ruth Anne Tobias. Others
present were Ray Bockman, Gary Hanson, Christine Johnson, Greg Millburg, Ken
Campbell, Laura Campbell, Diane Strand, Anita Turner, Joan Hanson and Jim
Scheffers.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Moved by Ms. Fullerton,
seconded by Mr. Augsburger, and it was carried unanimously to approve the
minutes from March 2008.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Moved by Mr. Hulseberg,
seconded by Ms. Tobias, and it was carried unanimously to approve the
agenda.
COMPENSATION FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
Mr. Gary Hanson, Deputy County
Administrator, said that the worksheet before the committee this evening
deals with compensation for the County Board members, Circuit Clerk and the
Coroner.
Ms. Fullerton asked if they could
separate out the county board members from the other individuals?
The committee agreed to separate
out the voting.
Mr. Bockman said that the
discussions that he has had have been about the way that it is displayed.
Typically the appointed officials salary is exclusive of the deferred
compensation amount and is footnoted on the resolution. Hopefully, you will
have enough information in front of you to clearly show what people are
making today and in the future.
Mr. Bockman said that the County
Board Chairman’s salary on the chart reflects that with DeKalb County being
what is considered an urban county, this is one of the lowest salaries that
we have seen.
Mr. Faivre said to Mr. Bockman, when you do
comparatives you just do them on government officials and not private
individuals - private industry is lower on everything.
Mr. Bockman said that Kane County did a
study on elected officials with the private industry. As of a result of
that study they are raising their clerk’s salary from $79,000 to $95,000
this year.
Mr. Bockman further stated that
it’s not a matter of catching up with Kane County or DuPage County, no one
will ever suggest that. Ogle County is looking at the Coroner’s position and
Peoria County is looking at a substantial increase for the Circuit Clerk
and Coroner’s positions.
Mr. Faivre said though that the
people paying the taxes here in this county do not get a 22.6% increase in
pay like these positions.
The committee then discussed the
Coroner’s part-time position and the ESDA Director’s part-time position that
is shared by one person.
Mr. Bockman said that it is not a
traditional combination of jobs. The ESDA Director salary is at $37,000 and
the Coroner’s salary is $47,500.
Mr. Steimel said then that is
about a $90,000 salary for this person.
Mr. Augsburger said in a free
market that since these are what we consider to be top management positions,
you could not hire people into these positions at these salaries.
Mr. Bockman said that managers in
the private sector are making more than this, he feels.
Chairman Haines, said that we are
not the private sector, we are the public sector. We need to discuss the
position, not the people in these positions. We could get a rookie in the
next year or so if these people leave or retire who would start at this
salary, who could be completely inexperienced.
Mr. Bockman also discussed that
the Circuit Clerk does perform as the Court Administrator along with her
duties as the Circuit Clerk. She does not have an assistant to perform as
the Court Administrator. He believes that the Circuit Clerk does perform
all of the work as the Court Administrator.
Chairman Haines said that we are
setting the Circuit Clerk’s and the Coroner’s salaries now. He suggested
that the committee could separate the voting on this position and the
Coroner’s too.
After further discussion it was moved by
Mr. Faivre, seconded by Mr. Steimel to increase the salary of the Coroner
and the Circuit Clerk to increase it by 4%.
Mr. Hulseberg asked if the voting
on the two positions could be separated?
Mr. Faivre and Mr. Steimel said
that they had no problem on separating them.
Chairman Haines said then we have
two separate motions on the floor now. Four percent (4%) to the Circuit
Clerk and then 4% to the Coroner for their increases.
Chairman Haines said that he would
take the Coroner’s position first.
Ms. Tobias said that she felt the
Coroner’s increase was a little low with all the flooding and the NIU
shooting event that the Coroner/ESDA Director responded to and has been
working on. She would like to see a 5% increase for this position.
Mr. Steimel said that he could go with a 5%
increase on this position.
Chairman Haines asked if the committee
wanted to see a friendly amendment to make the increase 5%? It would be a
5% increase per year, compounded annually.
Moved by Ms. Fullerton, seconded by Mr.
Steimel, to have the salary increase amount to 5% for the Coroner/ESDA
Director position.
Chairman Haines said that Mr. Faivre has to
accept the 5% friendly amendment too. Mr. Faivre said that he would accept
that friendly amendment along with Mr. Steimel. The deferred compensation
for this recommendation would be at 3%.
Chairman Haines then said that the motion that the committee would be voting
on now would be for a 5% increase annually for the Coroner/ESDA Director
position. The committee voted unanimously to accept recommendation and to
forward it to the full board for approval.
The committee then discussed the salary
increase for the Circuit Clerk position, who also covers as the Court
Administrator.
Moved by Mr. Hulseberg to accept the
recommendation as stated for the Circuit Clerk’s salary increases of 9% the
first year and then 4% for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th
year. The deferred compensation for this position would be at 5%. Seconded
by Ms. Fullerton.
Mr. Steimel said that he would
like to see a 5% increase, not 9%.
Moved by Mr. Steimel, seconded by Mr.
Faivre, to allow the increase for the Circuit Clerk’s position to be set at
5% for the 1st year and then 4% for the remaining three years.
Amendment to this motion allowed
for the deferred compensation to be at 3%.
Motion failed with two votes being
yes and 5 votes being nay. Mr. Faivre and Mr. Steimel voted yes.
Chairman Haines said that he
was returning back to the original motion of Mr. Hulseberg’s, that is, to
accept the original recommendation of 9% increase for the 1st
year and then 4% for the remaining 3 years, with a 5% deferred compensation
recommendation.
There were 5 yes votes and 2 no
votes, Motion passed with Mr. Steimel and Mr. Faivre voting no.
Chairman Haines returned to the
County Board members, committee chairmen and Chairman of the Board
compensation recommendations.
Mr. Bockman said that more and
more boards are going to salaries for county boards. He recommended that
the county board should look at forming a sub-committee to look after 2010
census and before 2012 to review how you are compensating the board, the
size of the board, the chairmanship, etc.
He continued by stating that he
just could not recommend changing the Vice Chairman’s position. The
Chairman’s salary is low. To do the job right takes a lot of time and work
to chair this board. The Mayor of DeKalb gets paid $25,000, and County
Board Chairmen in urban counties get a lot more, even the Kendall County
Board Chairman gets paid more than our board chairman.
Mr. Steimel said that he supports
the per diem payment.
Mr. Bockman reminded the committee
that the board only sets 2 years for the County Board Chairman’s salary.
Moved by Mr. Augsburger, seconded
by Mr. Hulseberg, to forward the recommendation as shown on the document
passed out this evening by staff.
Mr. Faivre made a friendly
amendment to the motion to eliminate the committee chairmen compensation
only to receive their per diem only if the committee meets.
Mr. Augsburger and Mr. Steimel
both stated that whether the committee meets or not, there is still a lot of
work that the committee chairmen do.
Mr. Faivre withdrew his friendly
amendment.
Back to the original motion
made by Mr. Augsburger, seconded by Mr. Hulseberg to forward the
recommendation as shown on the document passed out this evening by staff to
the full board for approval.
There were 6 yes votes and 1 no
vote, Ms. Fullerton being the no vote. Motion passed.
FACILITY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENTAL UPDATE
Mr. Ken Campbell, Facilities Management
Director, briefly updated the committee on projects that his department has
completed for 2007 and new projects that they will be working on for 2008.
He said that his office has a full
print shop in their department. They do multi-layer forms, envelopes,
county board packets, etc. They do about 130,000 pieces of print orders a
month. They have mail room services, too.
In 2007 they replaced the fire
alarm system in the Administration Building, did a large caulking project in
the Public Safety building and Administration Building. They finished a
4-year courtroom carpeting project too, where they replaced all the
carpeting in the courthouse. They upgraded the panic alarms on the Sycamore
campus and performed a scanning project for the Assessments Department that
now appears on our network.
In 2008 they completed the
upgrading of the panic alarm system and the carpeting project at the
courthouse. They renovated courtroom 204 and will be replacing the
carpeting. In the Public Safety Building they completed the replacement of
the server for the air conditioner and in the Administration Building for
the same thing. They had 100-year old chairs sent out for repair and
refinishing. They reconstructed the Public Safety Building garage floor
drains and replaced valves for 52 showers in the Jail. They replaced the
Public
Safety Building’s water heater and boiler,
which will be much more energy efficient.
The committee thanked Mr. Campbell
for his very informative report.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Mr. Augsburger,
seconded by Mr. Steimel, and it was carried unanimously to adjourn the
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Chairman Michael Haines
|