|
The DeKalb County Regional Planning Commission
(RPC) met on January 24, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the DeKalb County Administration
Building, Conference Room East, in Sycamore, Illinois. In attendance were
Commission members Cheryl Aldis, Frank Altmaier, Mike Becker, Rich Gentile,
Becky Morphey, Bill Nicklas, Martha May, Don Pardridge, Paul Rasmussen, Suzanne
Sedlacek, Roger Steimel, Ralph Tompkins, and Jerry Thompson, as well as Bill
Beverly representing the City of Sandwich. Also in attendance were presenters
Kristin Rehg and Larry Thomas of Baxter Woodman, Chris Greer of the NIU Geology
Department, and Jack Wittman of Wittman Hydro Planning. Audience members in
attendance were Ruth Anne Tobias, Julia
Fullerton, Pat Vary, Anita Turner, Eileen Dubin, Colin Booth, Mark Biernacki,
Jerry Augsburger, Doug Dashner, Donna Prain, and Kate Schotti. Staff
included Ray Bockman, Paul Miller, and Rebecca Von Drasek.
1. Roll Call
-- Mr. Rasmussen noted that Dan Godhardt was absent and he welcomed
Bill Beverley (Sandwich) and Martha May (Lee - Alternate) to the meeting.
2. Approval of Agenda
– Mr. Nicklas moved to approve the agenda,
which was seconded by Ms. Aldis, and the motion carried unanimously.
3. Approval of Minutes –
A correction was
noted by Ms. Aldis on page six of the September 27, 2007 minutes indicating that
the Census Bureau was responsible for removing duplicate entries from the
Special Census, not the Town. Additionally, Mr. Altmaier asked if Mr. Steimel
had referenced drought in the State of Washington or Washington D.C. as the
minutes stated. Mr. Steimel affirmed that he had referenced D.C. as well as the
western part of the nation as both areas were discussed at the Kane County
Conference.
Mr. Steimel then moved to approve the minutes,
seconded by Mr. Thompson, and the motion carried unanimously.
4.
Resolution of Appreciation for Jim Knox -
Mr. Miller
presented a resolution honoring Jim Knox, a member of the RPC, for his
dedication and service to the City of Sandwich and the Regional Planning
Commission. Mr. Rasmussen explained that the resolution would be forwarded to
the City of Sandwich by staff.
Mr. Steimel moved to approve the Resolution,
seconded by Ms. Aldis, and the motion carried unanimously.
5. Regional Water Planning -
Mr. Miller briefed the Commission that
representatives of Baxter Woodman, Wittman Hydro Planning and NIU would make a
presentation on groundwater. This is the result of the initial groundwater
scope study which was recommended at the September 27, 2007 RPC meeting. He
mentioned that included in the member packets was a copy of the agreement for
the work scope study and that the presentation was intended to be informational
in nature and that no action was required by the Commission.
Kristin Rehg
(Baxter Woodman) began the Power Point presentation by reviewing the purpose of
the project and the fundamental questions that the contractors would attempt to
answer through a physical study of DeKalb County’s groundwater; (1) What are the
current and future water demands, (2) How much water is available and how much
can we safely use, (3) How can we extend water supplies as growth occurs, (4)
What is the appropriate time frame and level of accuracy for answering these
questions. Ms. Rehg asserted that the future water demands are dependent on the
type of conservation methods applied, whether they are passive or active. Ms.
Rehg explained the type of conservation methods employed affect the cost of the
conservation. To answer the second question, whether the quantity meets the
demand, Ms. Rehg reported the researchers have to model the distribution, which
can be simulated through computer modeling. Ms. Rehg then noted that in the
Kane County’s study, which cost approximately three million dollars, a third of
the cost was spent on modeling. For the third and fourth questions, she stated
the researchers would need information that was available such as the growth
projections from the Comprehensive Plan, however, the last question’s level of
accuracy was dependent on how much additional information is gathered. Ms. Rehg
closed by outlining the remainder of the presentation.
Chris Greer (NIU Geology) highlighted the known
and unknown aspects of the local geology and hydrogeology. He explained the
layers that are thought to make up DeKalb County’s geology, and briefly touched
on the historical factors (i.e. glaciers and other deposits) that provided the
various layers. He then explained how the geological factors create the
hydrological features that are studied in groundwater research. He defined two
of the known hydrogeological features as the St. Charles and Troy Bedrock
Valleys. He noted the actual size and locations of these aquifers is still
unknown. Lastly, Mr. Greer provided a regional slide that depicted the Troy
Valley aquifer being primarily recharged in DeKalb, Ogle, and Winnebago
Counties, and then indicated the flow of groundwater to areas east and southeast
of DeKalb County.
Larry Thomas (Baxter Woodman) presented a
summary of the laws governing groundwater use and regulation, asserting that
there are no federal laws that apply. He then highlighted the Illinois State
case law which generally established that if a property owner can get to the
water from their own property and does not waste it in their use, they are
within their legal rights to do so even if it causes a neighboring property to
go dry. He noted that the Water Use Act of 1983 defined “reasonable use” and
the notification requirements when taping into an aquifer. Mr. Thomas briefly
explained the Water Authorities Act and how authority is gained over a watershed
by referendum, these agencies can then limit quantity removed. He then covered
other laws which grant permission to access the aquifers but that also do not
control the quantity removed. Mr. Thomas then touched on agencies that have
oversight of groundwater, explaining that the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for
Planning (CMAP), was suggesting various conservation methods but were not
suggesting policy or agencies be created to govern water rights. In concluding,
Mr. Thomas discussed what other surrounding Counties’ studies have
entailed.
Lastly, Jack Wittman (Wittman Hydro Planning)
presented the proposed study and outlined the tasks necessary to answer the
study questions posed by Ms. Rehg. Mr. Wittman spoke at length, highlighting
the various options from using existing information to computer-based
groundwater flow modeling, test borings, and test pumping. He stressed that the
level of accuracy was based on the amount of information the study collects.
Mr. Bockman expressed disappointment that other
communities already pumping groundwater have the right to pump DeKalb County
dry, even if the groundwater is stored under DeKalb County. Mr. Wittman
highlighted this as an issue that can be addressed in the groundwater study of
internal (“What about us” - drought concerns) and external (“What about them” -
growth concerns) options.
Mr. Thomas then reemphasized that since the
water flow basically initiates in DeKalb County, property owners in the County
have the right to the water first. He suggested DeKalb County could,
hypothetically, tap the resource and then sell the water.
Ms. Fullerton asked for a definition of “waste”,
to which Mr. Thomas explained that water is considered wasted on artificial
wants, such as wants other than human and livestock consumption.
Mr. Rasmussen acknowledged the cyclical nature
of the problem where as growth and climate may limit quantity, flooding and
stormwater management practice could hinder quality.
Mr. Wittman stated that communities should plan
for drought, and therefore encourage (internal) growth and then be prepared to
respond to external growth. He reiterated that hydrologically DeKalb County as
the recharge area of the Troy Valley aquifer was in an interesting position.
Mr. Thompson observed that the majority of
people in the region lived to the east of DeKalb County and that if necessary
(i.e. drought) laws are likely to be changed to benefit that majority.
Mr. Wittman stated that he was attending a
Conference in May with the Paul Simon Policy Institute discussing what water
statues will be in the future. He expressed the desire for the issue to be
apolitical, but recognized that the science can often be too focused to offer
real world solutions.
The presenters were asked what was Kane County’s
rational to spend three million dollars, to which Mr. Thomas indicated the
projected growth rate in Kane County justified the expense to them.
Additionally, they will be able to curb growth by limiting water access if they
are given that authority.
Ms. May asked of the Commission how can they
guarantee the growth in DeKalb County, since 30-50 years ago no one could have
predicted the amount of growth DeKalb County is seeing today.
Mr. Pardridge emphasized that the Countywide
Comprehensive Plan was the mechanism by which the growth is projected.
Mr. Rasmussen also noted that the County was 95%
agricultural at the time of the Comprehensive Plan and once built out the Plan
still projected 91% of DeKalb County to be agricultural.
Mr. Wittman then
offered that by using existing information that a groundwater study would take
approximately one year. If the study were to include drilling, then it would
take approximately two years.
Mr. Brockman asked what level of information
would the existing data provide. The presenters suggested that it would provide
the current rate of usage and possibly the recharge rate, they did not think it
would accurately predict the quantity or the flow rate of the water supply.
Mr. Wittman stated that the one-year study would
cost approximately $500,000. If the study were to include drilling the
additional cost would be approximately $15-20,000 per hole, depending on depth.
Mr. Rasmussen asked what level of certainty
would the current information provide as to the location of the aquifers. Mr.
Thomas stated that without drilling the level of certainty will be low.
Ms. Vary asked how accurate was the Kane County
study, Mr. Thomas said that Kane had drilled approximately every 600ft.
Mr. Thomas also indicated that the information
was less known in some areas of DeKalb County and better known in others.
Mr. Nicklas suggested that the Commission
convene on the topic due to the hour and allow Commission members to bring back
reaction from their respective boards/council at a special meeting of the RPC in
February.
Ms. Aldis asked if the County was on board to
ask the voters for a referendum, and if that referendum would have a sunset
clause. Mr. Bockman stated that the County Board would review any proposal
prepared by the Regional Planning Commission.
6. Chair and Vice-Chair Elections -
Mr. Miller pointed out that the Regional
Planning Commission elected its current Chairman, Paul Rasmussen, at its March
23, 2006 meeting. Roger Steimel has served as the Vice-Chairman since that
date. Per the Commission’s Charter, the Chairman and Vice-Chairman are to serve
two-year terms. Commission members should, therefore, give consideration to
nominations for the Chair and Vice-Chair positions, and be prepared to vote for
the same at the March 27, 2008 meeting.
7. Member Re-appointments -
Mr. Miller reminded the representatives from the
City of Genoa, Village of Kirkland, and DeKalb County about the expiration of
their terms and the need to review with their respective council or board who
will be the representative and alternate for the new terms.
8. Municipal Development
Projects -
Included within each Commissioner packets were
the current development projects.
Mr. Rasmussen noted that due to the late hour
instead of previewing every community he asked if any of the representatives had
anything new to announce.
Mr. Beverley (Sandwich) announced that the
Timber Creek Inn had held its grand opening.
The next RPC meeting is scheduled for
February 28, 2008 at 7:00 pm Conference Room East.
9. Adjournment
-- Mr. Tompkins motioned to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Gentile, and the motion
carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Rasmussen
Chairman, DeKalb County Regional Planning
Commission
RGV:rgv |