|
BOARD MEMBERS
PRESENT: Glenda Pecka,
R.N., M.S., President; Steve Kuhn, P.A., Vice President; Carl
Heinisch, Secretary; Russell Bishop, Psy.D.; Julia Fullerton;
Rosemary Lane, M.D.; Fred Peltz, D.D.S.; Debra Schelkopf, D.V.M.;
Steve Wolf, R.N.
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
Mike Groark, J.D.
MINUTES
On a motion by Ms.
Fullerton, seconded by Mr. Kuhn, the minutes of the Board of Health
meeting of January 28, 2003, were approved. Motion carried.
DIVISION REPORTS
Mrs. Grush
announced that tomorrow is the 30th anniversary of the
employment of Mr. Drake, Director of Environmental Health. She
added that he was presented with a certificate at the County Board
meeting last week.
Mrs. Grush stated that all counties
in the state of Illinois have received Local Health Prevention Grant
money for many years, which supports a statewide system of local
health departments to assure the protection of the public through
the provision of various health protection programs, such as
communicable disease and environmental health programs. This grant
is based on a formula using population, per capita income and
assessed valuation. Minimum grant awards are $50,000. Mrs. Grush
explained that the Northern Illinois Public Health Consortia was
successful in getting a Cook County legislator to sponsor a bill
changing the distribution of the funding based solely on
population. This would result in 81 health departments in the state
losing Local Health Protection Grant funding and would create
significant damage to the local public health system serving
counties outside of Chicago and the suburban area. The Consortia
also proposes that health districts be established across counties
based on minimum population thresholds, recommending a threshold of
250,000 to 500,000. Those health departments falling into this
threshold would remain as they currently exist. Others below that
threshold would become districts, such as the joining of Boone,
DeKalb, Ogle, Whiteside, Lee, JoDavies and Stephenson counties.
Administrators outside the collar counties have banded together to
defeat this legislation arguing that this would create an extra
costly layer of middle management, that communities have greater
control over public health programs through a local board of health,
and that it would create a significant division among the ranks at a
time when they should be working together and strengthening public
health in the state. Mrs. Grush pointed out that this bill has
passed out of both the House and the Senate on first reading. Both
Senator Burzynski and Representative Waite are opposed to the bill
and indicated that this is an example of the effort that is on a
fast track to redirect many downstate dollars to Chicago and the
suburbs.
Mr.
Heinisch stated that this argument has been ongoing in various
levels of government and will continue to be an issue. Mrs. Grush
stated that this legislation was not discussed at the meeting of the
Public Health Administrator’s Association. Mrs. Pecka asked if Mrs.
Grush had taken any action against the proposed changes, and she
indicated she has responded to these issues. She cited one of the
concerns being that one-third of the legislators are from the City
of Chicago, one-third from the suburbs and one-third from the rest
of the state; consequently, the vote will direct money to Chicago
and suburbs.
Mrs. Grush stated that another issue
facing public health is funding to assist in addressing West Nile
Virus (WNV) and other vector diseases. The Public Health
Administrators’ Association supports HB 2812, which increases the
used tire fee to $2 per tire toward funding for West Nile. She
reported that our agency still has 10,000 briquettes on hand, and
Mr. Drake has scheduled a meeting in April to distribute them and
train individuals on how to drop them in catch basins.
The Health Department has
experienced a number of building problems, including broken pipes,
which happened twice in January. The current problem is that there
are two sets of controls on the heating system that do not
communicate with each other. To better manage this system, Invensys
controls will be placed on this system and the Trane controls
removed, and the system will be monitored by Central Plant staff in
Sycamore rather than by the Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
staff.
Mrs.
Grush thanked Karen Hills and Deb Rolf for the time they have
invested in implementing the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) at the Health Department and Home Care.
She added that this project is a huge undertaking for any health
care provider.
Mrs. Grush reported that progress is
being made with the smallpox program, with workers compensation
remaining the biggest issue on a statewide level, resulting in less
participation in the program than the State had hoped. There are
several bills at the State level that address this, making a
smallpox reaction a coverable loss when the vaccine is given for
work-related purposes. The DeKalb County Board did pass a
resolution at their meeting last week making this a coverable loss
under the County’s Self-insured Workers Compensation Program.
DeKalb County was a training site for
the northern part of state for the administration of smallpox. To
date, three Health Department employees have received the vaccine: Peg
Carroll, coordinator of Communicable Disease; Gary Judd, HIV Prevention
Specialist; and Jane Lux, Director of Personal Health Services. The
main complaint of all three participants has been itching at the site.
March 27 is the first official clinic day scheduled for public health
and hospital providers to come to our Health Department to receive the
vaccine. Mrs. Grush is scheduled for that day, as well as six staff
from Rochelle Hospital. She showed the 54-page consent to the Board,
which must be received five days before being vaccinated. CDC
developed the majority of the consent, but part of the holdup with
implementing it was supplements added by the state of Illinois. Mrs.
Grush stated she would like to say we are getting a team ready, but
should Illinois or DeKalb County have a case, it would take more than
five individuals to administer the vaccine.
Dr. Peltz asked if the public should
consider receiving the vaccine. Mrs. Grush responded that she does not
feel the general public should get it at this time. Mr. Wolf stated
that he was aware of a list of volunteers from Valley West Community
Hospital and Kishwaukee Community Hospital (KCH) who said they wanted
to receive the smallpox vaccine. Mrs. Grush stated both facilities
have submitted names to the state, but their concern is that staff
could transmit the disease to a patient and the liabilities associated
with that. Mr. Kuhn indicated that he was told he would need to take
three weeks of vacation if he was vaccinated. Mrs. Grush believes that
KCH has the same policy. Dr. Bishop asked who would receive this
consent form. Mrs. Grush responded that this consent is for the Phase
1 volunteers and assumes the same form will be used for the Phase 2
individuals, which includes health care providers and clinics and other
Health Department employees.
Dr. Bishop asked Mrs. Grush if she
had any idea what could be done to increase people’s willingness to
participate in Phase 1 and Phase 2. Mrs. Grush responded that
individuals must be guaranteed that they will be covered under
workers compensation for any related illness and can work with a
dressing over the site or be paid if required to be off work for
three weeks, as well as some kind of protection from the federal
government for those who are not working. If individuals, such as
retired nurse are recruited to help, they will also need some
protection. She added that there is current legislation at the
federal level that will place this vaccine under the Vaccines for
Children (VFC) fund that would provide $50,000 (minimum) if you
became ill from the vaccine and $266,000 if the individual died as a
result of receiving the vaccine. She added that there is a group
of people that would have volunteered months ago if the federal
government had had these assurances in place. The workers
compensation issue will be settled at the state level during the
current legislative session. The government hoped to have 10
million volunteers by this time and have only 12,000 to 15,000
nationwide.
Mr. Heinisch asked what the Health
Department is hearing about SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome)
at this point. Mrs. Grush responded that information is being
received several times a day and there is one suspect case in
Chicago. 30 other cases are being investigated. Mrs. Carroll,
coordinator of Communicable Disease, explained the screening
criteria as contact with someone who has recently traveled and a
fever of greater than 104 degrees.
Mr. Drake, director of Environmental
Health, reported that he is receiving requests from service groups
to speak on West Nile Virus. Mr. Wolf asked if the fact that our
area experienced a cold winter would have an effect on the mosquito
larvae population. Mr. Drake responded that it will help but
pointed out that the virus is actually in the birds and carried by
the mosquito. He is coordinating mosquito control efforts with
municipalities and all are interested, with some having budgeted for
larviciding.
Mrs. Grush reported that Mrs. Lux,
director of Personal Health Services, has had a difficult few months
with staffing. A number of employees have left and Mrs. Lux has
tried to replace them with bilingual staff, with no luck. Mrs.
Grush stated the agency was fortunate to recruit Bette Chilton, who
is bilingual, back as WIC Coordinator, beginning June 2. Ms.
Chilton has worked for the agency in the WIC program in the past and
also knows public health. She added that one of the benefits that
helped recruit Ms. Chilton was the cost and coverage of our health
insurance.
Mr. Kuhn asked if charging for
Family Planning contraceptives would help cover the increase in
pharmaceutical costs. Mrs. Grush responded that clients are charged
based on a formula under the grant, with the majority of clients
being lower-income and not paying much. She pointed out that the
cost of birth control pills to agencies has increased while the
grant for next year serving the same number of clients is at the
same dollar figure.
Mrs. Baj, director of Home Care,
reported a great deal of activity in her program with building and
restructuring and the addition of cubicles, phones and computers.
Mr. Wolf asked if there was any competition in the home care market
in this area. Mrs. Baj responded that Carleton does have some
patients in our area, as do the Visiting Nurses Association and
Swedish American’s program from Rockford and Fox Valley serving the
eastern portion of our area. Mr. Wolf asked if it could be assumed
that the Health Department receives at least 95 percent of referrals
from the hospitals. Mrs. Baj stated that she has been told this by
nursing homes, but hospitals do not release that information.
Mrs. Zanellato, director of Health
Education, reported that she has not yet heard the grant awards for
next year in her programs. She continues to do a great deal of work
with the Bioterrorism Grant in terms of creating a directory and
planning.
Mr.
Wolf asked if an HIV Grant award had been received. Mrs. Grush
reported that she submitted a request of $45,000 and has been
awarded $36,000, adding that she feels fortunate to receive that.
She pointed out that DeKalb County has a strong program for such a
small county. Mrs. Carroll stated that our agency works very hard
to locate clients as they are not as readily identifiable as they
are in a metropolitan area.
FINANCIAL DATA
Mrs. Grush pointed
out that expenses for February were up because physical therapy
services had not yet been billed for January and February, and there
was a large supply order for Family Planning and employee wellness.
On a motion by Dr. Bishop, seconded by
Mr. Wolf, the Financial Statements for the months of January and
February 2003 and the Claims for the months of February and March 2003
were approved. Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
Board of Health Membership Vacancy
Dr. Bishop, chair
of the Nominating Committee, asked for recommendations to the Board
of Health to replace Dr. Cole who has recently left the community.
Mrs. Grush asked members to contact either Dr. Bishop or her, adding
that the physician vacancy is a very difficult one to fill.
Home Care Administrative Review
Home Health
revenue for 2002 was $2,149,601, as compared to $1,943,739 in 2001.
A chart of cost, charge and limit per visit was presented from 1995
through 2002. A chart showing the source of referrals and
admissions, as well as reasons for discharge, was presented. Total
unduplicated patients for 2002 was 947 with a total of 17,900 home
visits made, compared to 2001 with 861 patients and 15,470 visits.
The Home Care Program is required to
conduct chart audits on a quarterly basis on a percentage of charts.
This year, Mrs. Baj included some case mix profiles comparing 622 cases
in our program to 3,259,009 cases in the reference mean nationally.
Results showed that our program faired quite well and actually did
better in some areas. Over the past year, feedback has begun to be
received from a 25-page assessment that nurses are required to
complete. This feedback and data collected goes toward determining the
payment to be received for a 60-day episode for Medicare patients and
is also used for Outcome Based Quality Improvement (OBQI).
Home Care Policies and Procedures –
Recommended Changes
Recommended
changes to the DeKalb County Home Care Policies and Procedures were
presented. Mrs. Pecka questioned if the Social Worker Assistant was
a new category being used. Mrs. Baj responded that the agency only
had Medical Social Workers up until the last six months, but
assistants are now allowed in the rules and regulations, so an
assistant from Family Service Agency was contracted. This assistant
is able to do everything the social worker can do, but all
activities must be reviewed by the social worker. The Rules require
that the assistant have a Bachelors degree, while the one hired by
the Home Care Program has a Masters and is a licensed professional
counselor.
Dr. Lane asked about implementation
of the dress code in the Home Care Program. Mrs. Grush stated that
it was necessary to establish specific guidelines for a dress code,
which is in compliance with that of Public Health.
Home Care Classification/Staff
Recommendations
Classification and staffing
recommendations in the Home Care Program were presented. A
classification of Home Care Program Development Coordinator is
proposed, replacing that of Home Care Patient Care Coordinator. The
salary range decreases from $19.91 - $30.85 per hour to $18.55 -
$28.75 per hour. This is a 5 percent increase for the nurse
currently in the Quality Improvement Nurse position.
A reduction in the salary range of Home
Care Office Coordinator was proposed from $14.81 - $21.10 per hour to
$12.22 - $17.54 per hour. This is a 10 percent increase for the
individual currently in a Secretary B position who has accepted the
position, should it receive Board approval. The acceptance of this
position will reduce Secretary B classifications by .6 FTE.
It is being proposed that a new
classification title, Home Care Billing Coordinator, be implemented and
filled by the individual currently serving as Office Coordinator in the
program. Salary remains the same, and position title only changes.
Job descriptions for these three positions were presented.
A revised job description for the
Clinical Team Leader was also presented. An organizational chart of
the Home Care Division was presented.
Health Department Personnel Policy
Revisions
“Failure to report
to work or notify supervisor of reason for absence for three days”
was presented as a change to “Infractions Warranting Discipline and
Discharge.”
A clarification was made to the
On-call and Holiday Compensation chart compensating staff that work
on the Christmas Eve holiday at double time.
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act Policies
Mrs. Baj
distributed a handout to members that is used in training Home Care
staff on the HIPAA policies. The compliance date is April 14, 2003,
and the policies deal with the protection of individually
identifiable health information. Health plans, health care
clearinghouses and healthcare providers who transmit standard
transactions electronically are covered under this Privacy Rule.
Strict penalties exist for agencies in non-compliance with the Act.
Mrs. Baj explained that Protected Health Information (PHI) is
individually identifiable health information that is transmitted or
maintained in an electronic media or any other form or media.
Health information is anything that is created or received by a
healthcare provider that relates to the person’s health condition
and is individually identifiable. The Privacy Rule requirements
cover the use and disclosure of PHI, which can only be disclosed for
treatment, payment or health care operations or to the individual
themselves. Incidental disclosures and the minimum necessary
requirements were also reviewed. A Notice of Privacy Practices must
be given to all patients and clients in covered programs at the time
of first service delivery after April 14, 2003. Mrs. Baj indicated
that the Home Care Program was part of a consortia that contracted
with John Gilliland, a lawyer who developed templates for the
policies, Notice of Privacy Practices and forms. Public Health was
part of another consortium that contracted with Deanna Mool, a
lawyer in Springfield. This Act allows patients to request special
protection of their health information, as well as restrictions on
its use or disclosure. Patients can also inspect their health
record and request a copy. They may also request to have their
health information amended and may receiving an accounting of
disclosures of their PHI. Mrs. Baj stated that there are also a
number of administrative requirements, with every agency required to
designate a Privacy Officer, with our agency’s being Karen Hills at
Public Health and Deb Rolf for Home Care. All staff must be
trained, including volunteers and contracted staff and an individual
must be designated to receive complaints. She added that the
Security Rule would be coming out in the fall of 2003 addressing
standard transactions and code sets.
Mrs. Pecka asked about the
requirements relating to mental health care. Mrs. Baj responded
that those releases are more stringent and require a special
authorization with a specific purpose. Mrs. Hills added that the
client is not allowed to access psychotherapy notes.
No changes were recommended to the
Board of Health Bylaws at this time.
On a motion by Mr. Heinisch,
seconded by Dr. Peltz, all recommended changes were approved as
presented. Motion carried.
Vision and Hearing Screening Program
Mrs. Grush reported that several
changes have occurred in the Vision and Hearing Screening Program to
cause management staff to reevaluate the program. This service has
been provided to children in preschool, day cares and all public and
parochial schools in DeKalb County since the origination of the Health
Department. Approximately 14,700 students are screened each year, with
29,400 tests conducted. This includes children in grades 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 8, 9, all special education students, teacher referrals and
children new to the district.
Mrs. Grush indicated that screening
is the responsibility of the school district, not the Health
Department. This service has been provided to the school districts
at no cost to them. Mr. Wolf asked if the schools required this by
law. Mrs. Grush responded that some grades are mandated to be
provided with this service, either by the schools’ own staff or by
someone with whom they contract. Our Health Department has received
$18,000 in grant money for this service. Because the grants have
been stagnant for years, many health departments have discontinued
providing this service and/or began charging schools for the
service.
Current
costs of the program were presented, with direct costs at .6 FTE at
$32,000 and overhead at $15,000, for a total of $47,000. Revenue
for the program is $36,100. There are a number of issues that have
developed with this program including the need to receive consent to
screen all children and provide them with a Notice of Privacy
Practices under HIPAA if the agency continues to bill IPA. Another
concern is that this particular IPA billing has always been a
time-consuming task for agency staff, because they must match the
names of students served from the school rosters with a listing from
the IPA office of eligible children. Another issue is that the
state grant has been stagnant for years, and because of the State’s
fiscal crisis, we have only received $100 or our 2003 grant that
began July 1, 2002. Our agency has always provided more screening
than is required by the School Code. A final reason is that both
our technicians have health issues that make their continued
employment uncertain, and training of new staff would be difficult
as the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) has gone from
seven to two trainers statewide.
Mrs. Grush made the following
recommendations: (1) reduce the children screened to the mandated
grades, thereby reducing the number of test by approximately 50% and
reducing the cost of the program; (2) do not bill Public Aid so the
HIPAA requirement is eliminated; and, (3) reevaluate the ability to
continue providing the service to the schools as warranted.
Mr. Wolf moved to accept the proposed
recommendations, seconded by Dr. Schelkopf. Motion carried.
CORRESPONDENCE AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Correspondence
included a letter from Representative Hastert in response to Mrs.
Grush’s letter expressing concerns about the availability of
spectrum frequency for public safety needs.
Newspaper articles for January and
February focused on the preparation for smallpox
vaccination, the
recovery of a 12-foot python by Animal Control staff, February as
National Heart Month, the New American Plate campaign for healthy
eating, and an Altrusa literacy project of presenting book bags.
ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Mr.
Heinisch, seconded by Dr. Lane, the Board of Health meeting
adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Motion carried.
Carl Heinisch, Secretary
DeKalb County Board of Health |