|
The Ad Hoc Open Space
Study Sub-Committee met on Monday, November 22, 2004 @ 7:00p.m. in the
DeKalb County Administrative Building’s Conference Room East. Chairman
Jeffery Metzger called the meeting to order. Members present were Julia
Fauci, Julia Fullerton, Terry Hannan, David Baker, Michael Haines, Frank Van
Buer and Joseph Wiegand. Members absent were John Acardo, Kevin Braden and
Gary Hanson. Mr. Greg Millburg was also present.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Moved by Mr. Hannan,
seconded by Mr. Wiegand, and it was carried unanimously to approve the
minutes from October 2004.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Moved by Mr.
Wiegand, seconded by Mr. Haines, and it was carried unanimously to approve
the agenda.
Before beginning the
meeting Chairman Metzger asked Mr. Van Buer, Mr. Baker and Mr. Haines to
introduce themselves to the committee since they were absent at the October
meeting.
ANSWER QUESTIONS FROM LAST MONTH’S
MEETING
Chairman Metzger read off the 7 questions that still needed to be answered
from last month’s meeting. Those were: 1.) How do we want to define open
space? 2.) If we are going to increase taxes to buy public land shouldn’t
the taxpayer know what land we are purchasing? 3.) What is the percentage
of open space that we have in relation to other counties? 4.) We’re looking
for – What acreage? What year? What dollar amount? What the economic
development benefits for future open space would provide for the county?
5.) What our priorities are when it comes to tax dollars? 6.) What other
funding mechanisms are available for preserving future open space? and,
7.) Determine as a committee, to allocate funds to do research on this
issue, and if so, how much are we willing to spend to investigate this?
Mr. Hannan,
DeKalb County Forest Preserve District Superintendent, explained to the
committee what open space means. He explained that a public open space
would include parks, forest preserves, etc. A city park would be a park
that is active, meaning recreation areas, picnic areas, softball, baseball,
basketball leagues, etc. The higher end of open space would be the
Department of Natural Resources were people come from miles around for 1 day
or so. The Forest Preserves fall in the middle, where they are conservation
oriented. They have picnic areas, hiking trails, biking trails, canoeing,
shelter houses and are situated where most people can get to within a half
hour’s drive. On the private side, there are incentives privately for
people like conservation preservation, erosion control, tree planting, etc.
Mr. Hannan
continued by stating that in county run areas 90% or more of land is put in
conservation preservation or restoration, wetlands and trails, while 10% is
put in recreational.
Mr. Hannan
said that in Kane County they do try to keep the 90% for preservation and
restoration, but the Kane County Cougars stadium is owned by the Kane County
Forest Preserve. Another example is the riverboat on the Fox River that own
550 feet of parking space that generates $500,000 a year for Kane County
Forest Preserve.
What type of
funds did Kane County use to purchase the property for the stadium? Mr.
Hannan said that he didn’t know.
Chairman
Metzger asked if the funds could be appropriated for the use of a stadium, a
landfill or a golf course? Maybe this is a question that needs to be asked
on the referendum.
Mr. Wiegand
said that in Ogle County one of the issues that they looked at was the
former reclamation plant and what to do with it. One thing that came up
while they were researching this was that there were a significant number of
quarries that could be used to create parks. Maybe we could look to see if
DeKalb County has any underutilized quarries that could be used as
recreation areas, said Mr. Wiegand.
Mr. Haines
said that he feels that on a level of priority that the committee needs to
look at is defining high quality natural lands and recreational lands.
Another priority is that we need to find willing sellers. Finally, we also
need to prioritize land that is contiguous to existing forest preserves.
Ms. Fauci
said that the committee needs to address the waterway system, too, and look
at how it is burdening our streams and waterways. That is, there is a
natural system of waterways that we are burdening. We need to allow them to
overflow without damage being done to property that we need to keep open,
continued Ms. Fauci.
Mr. Van Buer
said that the county needs to protect farmland. He is interested in looking
at development rights. His concern is that we are going to be watching
DeKalb County disappear in the future.
Chairman
Metzger then asked the committee if they felt that we should have a
referendum?
Mr. Haines
said that our county has the lowest percentage of open space and the lowest
tax levy than other counties around us.
Mr. Hannan said that in
years past there was a list compiled called Vision 2000 that spoke about
items that our county should be looking at for forest preserves and
conservation in the future and he has referred to it over time. He
continued by saying that the bond referendum would be for $10 million
dollars and $5 million would be available for land acquisition. We would
need to spend at least 50% of it in the first 5 years. He currently knows
of 500 to 600 acres of land that is available to purchase for the forest
preserve district.
Chairman Metzger said
that he felt that the committee was not going to define what open space
means on a referendum this evening, but that they would like to have a
better idea of each of the questions. We are going to speak later this
evening about a person from the Conservation Foundation to come and visit
with the committee about their experience in referendums. The committee
discussed whether or not they should have the referendum in April of 2005 or
wait until April of 2006. The majority felt that if there was going to be a
referendum that the committee needed to do more research on it and that the
date of April 2006 would be better.
The committee discussed
how much pressure is there from the public for more land use conservation?
Mr. Haines said that his group (the citizen’s group) was formed because of
conservation concerns in the county and that there is a group of people who
are concerned about future development growth in Sycamore. He also said
that his group is willing to work with the county on the referendum and get
the word out there. Mr. Hannan stated that he receives phone calls from
people who are in favor of land use conservation, too.
Mr. Wiegand asked about
the comprehensive plan and recreational space, trails and the rail spur in
Shabbona. Could they all be tied together? Mr. Hannan and Ms. Fauci said
yes, they could be. Mr. Wiegand asked then, what sort of dollars are
involved if a railroad abandons the tracks? Ms. Fauci said that they
haven’t abandoned any in DeKalb County that she knows of because they still
make a lot of money off of them. She said to look at railroads as linear
parks and that it would be great to have one go all the way south to the
state park in Shabbona.
Mr. Hannan said that it
could be a possibility and that the trails really don’t cost much money.
The DeKalb/Sycamore Trail had donations from Com Ed, who donated easements,
Ideal Industries in Sycamore, the School district, DeKalb County Farm
Bureau, etc.
Mr. Wiegand said that in
1996 the Land Acquisition Fund failed and then the Community Foundation
created a fund for conservation. Mr. Hannan said yes, and that they do have
some seed money equal to $50,000 at one time for conservation. Twenty
thousand dollars is also allocated for education. Currently they have $4000
in the fund.
After further discussion
the committee agreed that if they would do a referendum that it would be for
March of 2006.
FUTURE MEETING DATES AND FREQUENCY
The committee agreed
that they would meet every other month until summer and then it would be
every month, that is, January 2005, March 2005 and May of 2005. Then when
summer starts in June, they would meet every month. The next meeting date
will be January 24, 2005. They will invite Mr. Brook McDonald of the
Conservation Foundation to come and speak with the committee about his
referendum experience.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Mr. Wiegand,
seconded by Mr. Haines, and it was carried unanimously to adjourn the
meeting.
Respectfully
submitted,
____________________________
Chairman Jeffery
Metzger
______________________________
Mary C. Supple,
Secretary |