APPROVAL OF
THE MINUTES
Mr. Wiegand moved, seconded by
Mr. Wilson to approve the minutes of June 2, 2004. Motion carried
unanimously by a voice vote.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Chairman Leifheit
stated that there was an additional item to be placed on the agenda under
#6a.) The Target Resolution. Mr. Weigand moved, seconded by Ms. Tobias to
approve the amended agenda. Motion carried unanimously by a voice vote.
UPDATE ON
STAINED GLASS WINDOWS IN THE COURTHOUSE
Mr. Ken Campbell,
DeKalb County Facilities Director, stated that the stained glass project
went to bid and that there were two companies that responded. The first
company was Houtkamp Art Studio from Rockford, Illinois, who bid $54,500.00
and the second company was Botti Studio Architectural Arts, Inc. from
Evanston, Illinois, who bid $25,900.00. Mr. Campbell felt that the second
company, which was the lowest bidder, was also the most qualified company.
He had originally had $30,000.00 approved by this committee for the project
and he has spent $3,000.00 already. He will need an additional $5,500.00 to
complete the project. He said that included in this money is $1,800.00 for
the architect’s fee and a $5,000.00 contingency clause. The differences
between the two companies are the amount of artists and the size of the
studios. The more expensive bid company has only one artist doing all the
work himself. The lower bid company has a lot more artists and a larger
studio. Mr. Campbell continued by explaining that when the windows are
removed to be taken to the artist’s studio, they will be replaced with
painted wood until the original windows are done.
Moved by Mr.
Faivre, seconded by Ms. Tobias, and it was carried unanimously to accept the
low bid of $25,900.00 from Botti Studio Architectural Arts, Inc., from
Evanston, Illinois, and to approve the increased amount of the stained glass
window project for $5,500.00, by a voice vote. Chairman Leifheit asked
where the extra money was going to come from? Mr. Hanson, DeKalb County
Deputy Administrator, said that it will come out of the Special Projects
Budget.
UPDATE ON GIS
PROJECTS: TRANSPORTATION AND E-911 MAPPING
Before beginning the
presentation, Mr. Wilson stated that he had received a letter recently
regarding an optic cable problem at the Sycamore Library. Could anyone
explain what was going on?
Ms. Joan
Berkes-Hanson, IMO Director for DeKalb County, gave a brief history of what
lead up to this point. The conduit, which is used for the Joiner History
Room, between the Public Safety Public and the Sycamore Library became
damaged and has stopped our computer network connection. Several
possibilities for a solution have been explored, each one being discounted
because of high costs. Just today, a solution may have been accomplished by
finally being able to pass a “fish line” through the conduit. This should
now allow a new cable to be strung. If the overall distance is too long for
the cable that can be run, additional hubs may have to be purchased. It is
hoped that network connectivity should be accomplished in a very short
period of time.
Ms. Berkes-Hanson, then
began her presentation to the committee regarding the G.I.S. project with
the Highway Department. She said that last year the County received an
$80,000 grant from IDOT to create a GIS project for the County’s Highway
Department. Her department met several times with Mr. Wayne Davey of the
Highway Department and Mr. Bill Lorence, the County Engineer to design the
GIS project to their specifications. She then showed a slide presentation
regarding the project progression over the last year. She explained that it
was a project that began in July 2003 and was intended to end in December
2006.
However, she feels that they have
progressed much further than anticipated and that they should be finished
with this project by the end of this year. The project is comprised of
seven databases, 1.) Accidents, 2.) Adopt A Highway, 3.) GASB34, 4.)
Highway, 5.) Lights, 6.) Signs, and 7.) Bridges.
Ms. Berkes-Hanson then
gave a brief presentation of how they will be able to link the seven
databases with GIS mapping capabilities. The signs and highways portion of
the project will be finished this summer.
As far as wireless phone calls,
Ms. Berkes-Hanson, reported that the E-911 Board is working on this project
so that when a wireless phone call comes – the call will be placed on a map
for them to see where it originated. Her department has a contract with the
E-911 Board to provide the base map which will be displayed on the
dispatcher’s console.
G.I.S. FEE INCREASE
Mr. Hanson presented a resolution
to the committee this evening with regards to increasing the G.I.S. fee
assessed on recorded documents by $11.00. He stated that there was an
extensive study done by “Maximus” of Northbrook, Illinois that made this
recommendation for the fee increase and stated that it was in accordance
with the Illinois Statutes. Mr. Hanson explained that this increase would
apply to recorded documents. The current rate is $3.00 and with an increase
of $11.00 for the total amount suggested of $14.00. Our county has been
below the average rates across the state, he said.
Mr. Sands asked if the
911 fund (wireless) monies could be used to pay for some of the G.I.S.
costs? Mr. Hanson said that it is unlikely that the 911 Board would want to
share any more revenues than they are currently sharing.
Mr. Van Buer asked if
we could phase into this fee increase? Mr. Hanson said that yes, the amount
and the timing is up to the board.
Mr. Faivre said that he feels
that the user should be paying for this fee.
Mr. Wiegand stated
that he could not support this resolution. He would need to see how many
documents the County recorded and then look at the cost calculations.
Mr. Bockman stated
that the county is subsidizing $11.00 of costs with taxpayer’s money.
Chairman Leifheit felt
that it was a huge increase. Mr. Hanson said to remember that all of the
taxpayers are paying for it now. He then said that if this resolution is
adopted it will pay for the entire G.I.S. department.
Moved by Mr. Faivre, seconded by
Mr. Sands, to support the G.I.S. Fee Increase resolution and to forward it
to the full board.
Discussion followed. Chairman
Leifheit asked what is in the fund now? Mr. Hanson said that the G.I.S.
costs are paid out of the General Fund. He said that the current $3.00
charge is reduced by $1.00 for the County Clerk’s fee, which leaves the
County with $2.00. With the increased fee there will be $14.00 collected,
then reduced by $1.00 to go the county clerk yet, for a total amount of
$13.00 to G.I.S. This will pay for the entire G.I.S. budget, he
reiterated. Mr. Bockman reminded the committee that the State is the one
who picked this fee not the County. We are following state statutes.
Ms. Tobias pointed out
to the committee that G.I.S. is a part of a whole section of Government now.
It is much more efficient and part of the governmental infrastructure.
Ms. Berkes-Hanson said that the
Recorder’s Office uses this information in their office daily. Kane
County’s cost is up to $25.00 to record a mortgage and that their G.I.S. fee
is $10.00. She also said that since the County has made the information
available on the Website that there have been numerous questions asked by
users and especially attorneys.
The committee discussed
whether or not they wanted another month to look at this resolution.
Mr. Wilson moved to
amend the resolution at the last line to read, “Increase from $3.00 to
$10.00 beginning August 1, 2004 and an additional increase of $4.00
beginning in August 1, 2005. Motion died for lack of a second.
Mr. Hanson said that
the fee study would be available on the Internet.
Moved by Mr. Faivre,
seconded by Mr. Van Buer, to table the resolution until next month so that
the committee and county board members could review the study and
comparisons. Motion carried unanimously.
TARGET RESOLUTION
Chairman Leifheit said
that the resolution before the committee this evening is the same one that
was brought to the county board meeting in April 2004, but that now we know
the firm.
Moved by Mr. Faivre,
seconded by Mr. Wilson, to recommend the Target Resolution to be forwarded
to the full board for approval.
Discussion followed.
Mr. Van Buer stated that he would be voting against this resolution because
of the economic rationale that the relocating industries already know where
they are going to go. Mr. Faivre said that it is like playing Russian
roulette as they may indeed go to their secondary choice. We would only be
giving them money to come that we won’t have unless they come.
Mr. Wiegand said that
he was concerned over the language in the 6th paragraph as he has
no facts to prove that the land-owners are in fact discounting the land
price. Mr. Faivre suggested that we remove it.
Moved by Mr.
Wiegand, seconded by Mr. Sands, to strike the 6th paragraph in
the resolution. Motion carried unanimously.
Returning to the
original motion, the Motion was carried with 2 no votes, being Mr. Van Buer
and Mr. Wiegand.
Before adjourning, Mr. Wilson
announced that his committee will be touring the Rochelle Railport either on
8/5/04 or 9/2/04. They will be leaving the Highway Department around
2:30p.m. to go there and then return to the Highway Department around
6:00p.m. for their monthly meeting. If any board member is interested in
attending, please contact him.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Leifheit thanked
everyone for a very good meeting and good discussion and heard a motion to
adjourn.
Mr. Wiegand moved,
seconded by Mr. Van Buer, to adjourn @ 8:30p.m. Motion carried unanimously
by a voice vote.
Respectively submitted,
_____________________________________
Sue Leifheit, Chairman
_____________________________________
Mary C. Supple, Secretary
J:Admin
Services Committee Minutes 070704.doc